發文作者:kahoo | 二月 6, 2008

程翔回家過新年

新年前夕訪問重溫:
李家豪、蘇賡哲即時專訪風雲女士」得獎者﹕ 程翔太太 劉敏儀
http://torontofirstnet.com/radioplay.php?file=20071227-1830

Source: Apple Daily


Responses

  1. 不管如何? 能夠獲得自由是件好事!

    在此祝大家 [暢所欲言], [求同存異], [立場雖不同,互重發言權]!

    戊子鼠年, [言路無阻], [思路暢通] !

  2. 程翔,一名愛國者,大半生走過迂迥曲折之路,坎坷艱辛,義無反顧,國家又可有愛他?

    情長,朋友落難,奔走相助,風雨同路,患難見真情。

    刑場,熱血染黃沙,獨裁極權鎮壓異己之地。

    情場,得意無往不利,失意屢戰屢敗,新丁盲頭烏蠅,老將識途老馬,不宜久留係時候結束長跑囉!

  3. 程翔,程翔,經此一役,唔好對某政權咁"情長"啦!

    鼠年將至,先祝程翔及其家人百無禁忌,身心健康!順祝各網友出入平安(最近常落大雪),工作愉快,恭喜發財!

  4. 一個人細個時候愛父母但是大個時變壞﹐唔養父母不止﹐羅晒的錢﹐仲吊佢地落政府養老院等死﹐可唔可以叫做孝順﹖﹗﹖

    販賣情報給台毒機構﹐分裂國家是世界上任何國家都是叛國大罪﹐更何況是自稱“愛國”的人﹐更加應該明白此等道理。沒判死刑已經是最大ge仁慈。

    程翔愛國﹖我呸﹗

  5. Good News! I agree with others’ view that there is no need to guess or investigate what happened prior to his release; for his trial and imprisonment were unjust and political.

    Yes, I would like to wish Kahoo/Dr. So/the 3 monkeys/fellow readers here “新年快樂, 龍馬精神".

    祝A1鼠年, 繼續做"過街老鼠 “

  6. TO CAT LOVER :
    見識這—- “程翔愛國﹖呸﹗ // February 6, 2008 at 12:02 pm "
    可惜唔係我果瓣 ! 我地單野暫停,有機會擇日再賽 ! 而家唔該請出場 ; 去…….馬 ! PLEASE ! ! !

  7. we think Mr Ching was innocent, he did not have to thank the Chinese government, but he had to because he is in this special situation, anyways,
    happy chinese new year to his family, especally his old parents

  8. Who knows 程翔 did not do it? If it is espionage(spy), it is classified, there is no transparency for espionage trial in any country in the world.
    When we look back into history, we know 汪精衛 was bad, but before 1933, everyone wanted him to help fight Japan. Please don’t get me wrong, I’m not compare him to 程翔, I’m just saying there are thing we don’t know, so let’s assume the justice system is at work.
    There may be a lot of people do not believe in the Communist Party controlled justice system. However, believe it or not all the Chinese people + all the foreign people in China, and all the economic and investment acitivites (the 3rd largest in the world) are operating under the same Communist Party controlled justice system. I think it is a good thing to see that China is as least trying to follow the justice process. And of course, we need to continue to criticize, to make it even better, but in a sensible and constructive way.

    To add a parallel comparison:
    Is this transparency good?– US Administration leaked her own CIA agent, Valeria Plame, in 2005
    http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/rove_cia_agent_leak_leads_to_rove.htm

    Both Canada & USA governments are unjust, inhuman, no transparency about Khadr–
    Khadr secret document released by accident shown– Just a US soldier’s “He felt”, a 15 years boy has been locked up since 2002 years. Where is justice, where is human right to a little Canada born boy? I’m Chinese I care about 程翔, but his is an adult, he knows what he did, he went thru the justice system, no matter how not transparent it was, and he got out with parole. This is totally justice at work. But Khadr was 15 years old, got framed and kidnapped, only military trials. In any human justice system, a child of 15 should not be put in prison for 6 years without formal court trial. I care about any unjust in the world, I care for 程翔, but he is “free", what about Khadr?

    http://www.thestar.com/article/300329
    …A classified document mistakenly released to reporters today revealed that Omar Khadr wasn’t the only one alive in an Afghan compound when an American soldier was fatally wounded…
    “There’s no openness about this process,” said Khadr’s military lawyer Navy Lt.-Cmdr. Bill Kuebler after the hearing. “It’s not that the government shouldn’t be able to protect information when there is a legitimate need to protect it, it’s the government’s overuse of classification . . . that basically keep one hundred percent of the evidence in the case outside of the public’s view except if the government decides to sort of dribble it out to you.”…”Based on his extensive combat experience, OC-1 believed that Khadr and the man at the back of the alley with the AK rifle were the only two alive at the time of the assault. He felt that due to the grenade being thrown simultaneously to the directed rifle fire that the grenade was thrown by someone other than the man who was firing the rifle.”…

  9. I am not a Falun Gong believer but I think the Power Politics fans maybe interested to know and talk about this news:

    STOCKHOLM, Sweden : China is trying to stop Sweden from staging a dance show with ties to the Falun Gong movement, claiming it could damage relations between the two countries, officials said Tuesday

    Madeleine Sjoestedt: “They stepped way over the line. I think they really owe us an apology and an explanation,”

    密克爾說:「這是一種試圖侵害瑞典言論自由的行為並且非常嚴重。人們可以和中國做貿易,但並不意味瑞典的人權要受到影響。」

    Does it sound like the 1540 storm?

    More info:
    http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/8/1/27/n1992222.htm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7218690.stm
    http://www.thelocal.se/9816/20080130/
    http://www.topix.com/travel/sweden/2008/01/entertainment-show-in-sweden-upsets-chinese-officials
    http://www.pr-inside.com/entertainment-show-in-sweden-upsets-chinese-r410660.htm

  10. 啊,大陸果D又係怪架喎,一係就唔放,一放就咁突然嘅?!話黎話黎,呯呯聲晨早9點就推咗人出監,急到都冇人黎得切去接,竟然要佢自己一個人坐火車落番香港!真係奇聞!不過點都好,出咗黎就好!唔知道經此一役,阿程嘅思想有D咩新體會呢?
    一本政經冇咗,冇得跟進,可惜,可惜!

  11. Is his trial a political or is justice at work?

    Let’s see:

    Is he a high ranking official fallen in a political battle?

    NO.

    Is he a highly valuable person that the government of China could gain in his imprisonment?

    NO, in fact, he was not even known to the public prior to his espionage incident.

    Does the government of China benefit politically or materially from his imprisonment?

    NO, on the contrary, the government of China became a BASHING TARGET after his allegations went public, and caused great PR ordeal, and probably forced an early probation even though he only completed HALF of his jail sentence.

    What does these facts tell us? Is 程翔 an innocent man?

    I DON’T THINK SO.

    I believe he is a traitor to the Chinese people by selling sensitive information to hostile entities to the Chinese people, which he most likely did commit.

  12. I believe “程翔 Must Serve Justice " is a spy and terrorist, is a traitor to the human race by selling his soul to hostile aliens and Satan, which he mostly likely did commit.

    What a bunch of BS..

  13. 程翔這話題在這留言區一開始顯示的見解/立塲頻譜已十分廣濶, 在最左端的有全面認同中國司法制度, 一口咬定程翔曾作間諜/特務, 出賣國家利益, 中間有雖同情程翔的遭遇, 但因支持中國政府, 故持並非不可能的立塲, 而另一端則有不相信程翔曾犯所指的罪行, 對中國司法制度不信任.

    由於對中國現政權和中國司法制度看法/信任程度的差異, 將使不同見解的人站在不同的平台上, 自說自話, 爭辯下去, 亦將得不同令任何一方信服的結論. 但在程翔這一事件中, 卻反映了一些現象, 值得深思.

    1. 香港人多不相信程翔曾犯所指的罪, 即使香港左派民建聯核心人物, 立法局議議員及新當選香港人大代表蔡素玉亦持這種看法.

    2. 程翔事件再一次反映要作一個愛國(現今中國)的人的困難/悲哀. 前有陳毓祥先生為保釣行動而葬身大海. 程翔, 香港第一學府畢業生, 為理念走進親中報社工作, 使自己有更多機會瞭解/親近國家. 因不能認同當權者的做法而離開親中圈子, 最終竟被指因財作間諜. 在現今的共產黨政權下的中國, 要安全保有愛國人士的名號, 看來最有效的方法是作應聲蟲的凡是派.

    最後, 題外數句. 程翔愛國﹖呸君的見解, 我雖不認同, 但他/她如果相信中國的司法制度是公正的, 得出程翔是有罪的結論是無可厚非的. 他的留言, 雖用詞有一些火爆, 但亦有舉例說明其觀點, 較一些胡亂謾罵的文字為佳.

  14. 劉家昌 講得好 !

  15. Cat Lover

    對程翔有罪無罪不置可否,並不一定是 [支持中國政府];你的歸納法我不敢苟同!

    較熟悉中國國情人士,會用不一樣的角度去看中國的政治.

    在中國,不同時期做同一樣政治事情,後果很可能會大大的不同;是中國人的悲哀.

  16. Michael // February 6, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    I believe Michael is a spy and terrorist, is a traitor to the human race by selling his soul to hostile aliens and Satan, which he mostly likely did commit.

    What a bunch of BS..

  17. Canada’s Khadr also very 悲哀, I think it is even 100 times worst. But who cares?

  18. 世上悲慘何其多,有君悲春哀秋已不錯!

  19. 程翔販賣〈情報〉給台灣,應該是愛國的表現才是呀,中共說台灣是中國一部份嘛,愛台灣豈能不算愛國呢,否認這一點才是分裂國家,好大好大的罪名啊!

  20. 程翔愛國﹖呸 is a spy, Hux Kax LXng

  21. 程翔販賣情報給台獨組織﹐直接參與支持分裂中國。

    佢應該以叛國罪被起訴﹐而唔是輕微得多的間諜罪。中國政府過于仁慈。

  22. 見龍在田,
    好句!
    姣婆蓮,
    好意見!

  23. 我相信中國近年間在不同途徑,不同層次,與台灣不同階層人物作非正式接觸.

    至於那些可以擺上台面,那些秘而不宣;那些可以做不可說,那些可以說不可做,非局內可清楚明白!

    搭橋鋪路非人人可做得到,小心地雷!

  24. 見龍兄:

    你可能沒有看清楚我的留言, 我是在說: {在我寫那篇留言時, 這留言區[一開始顯示的見解/立塲頻譜已十分廣濶].

    [在最左端的有全面認同中國司法制度, 一口咬定程翔曾作間諜/特務, 出賣國家利益,] 指程翔愛國﹖呸﹗君

    [中間有雖同情程翔的遭遇, 但因支持中國政府, 故持並非不可能的立塲]指我們的老朋友, 又愛又恨, 黑白不分君

    [而另一端則有不相信程翔曾犯所指的罪行, 對中國司法制度不信任.]指本人, 或可包括足球迷兄和蓮姐(如果我理解錯了他們的觀點, 請指正)

    我不是說凡是[對程翔有罪無罪不置可否]者, 皆支持中國政府. 我只是說這留言區中, 我理解的一位網友的觀點/立塲.

    又見龍兄另一篇留言有關與台灣人接觸的危險, 一語中的, 我認為是程翔事件中, 其中一個可以解釋的原因, 而且可能是最接近真相的原因. 因新春私事較忙, 待忙過後安靜下來, 將對程翔事件的一些推想寫下, 交付網友們推敲指正.

  25. 程翔是不是愛國?不是,不是。
    程翔是不是叛國?不是,不是。
    程翔是不是分裂國家?不是,不是。
    程翔是不是記者?不是,不是。
    程翔是不是間諜?不是,不是。
    程翔是不是普通人?不是,不是。
    那麼程翔是甚麼?
    程翔是一封﹝利是﹞馬龍不是早有答案嗎?抬頭看看。恭喜發財,利是豆來!

  26. Yes, “anything 暢通", “新年快樂, 龍馬精神 " to everyone (sources: 見龍在田 and Cytodex bros)

    程翔回家過新年 should serve two purposes:

    1. To prevent him from dying in a Chinese prison (in light of his deteriorating health condition)

    2. To dampen the rally of opposing voices to China’s track records of human rights abuse

    3. To neutralize the sentiments of the critics that China is not fulfilling its promises it made before securing its bid to host the 2008 Olympic Games (to be held both in and around Beijing and Hong Kong)

    Anyhow, congratulations 程翔, I am sure you now have the opportunity to write a book entitled: “程翔 – The Memoirs of Chinese Imprisonment" because your “crime of espionage" will never be justified by Chinese officials because their evidence against you is/was only circumstantial at best and is unsubstantiated to stand any trial in Hong Kong or in any western judicial system.

  27. Cat Lover,
    我明白你說的, 說得好 !
    恭禧發財!

  28. P.S. 當你第一次說, 我已經明白, 非常好.

  29. 程翔不是特赦而是假釋, 只許規規矩矩, 不許亂說亂動.

  30. 又愛又恨:黑白不分
    這是你在此第一次明白及同意 Cat Lover 的意見,新春伊始,好的開端; 非常好.

  31. 亞爺:我係程翔殺手,捉佢番黎,坐足三年先放佢走。
    陳冠希:我係情場殺手,帶女朋友番黎,訓三個鐘頭就趕佢走。
    煲呔:程翔單野我係撒手…懶理,亞爺派利是我就伸手,話咗會玩鋪勁又縮手,雙普選我就繞埋對手。
    關卓忠:程翔單野我幫唔到手,剩係幫吓口,話到尾都叫做一場朋友,佢程翔我情長。
    鄶子手:我係刑場殺手,新年流流,唔該你收口,咪逼我出手。

  32. In response to 獨孤bro’s points:

    When the justice system is to serve the governments than the people; and when the defendant is required to prove his innocence; and when a person is subject to long imprisonment before he is convicted, I do not see any advance in her civilization to mankind for the last half a century.

    Mr. Ching’s ordeals, like many others, are fine examples of why it is so dangerous and yet sad to be a Chinese, especially those patriotic ones that want to make a difference. There are not a few governments in the world that can lock up her own people (dissidents, labor/union activists, democracy supporters) and use them as bargaining chips with the West on human rights records. It’s not too difficult to find similarities among these countries…

    I think Mr. Ching’s latest book, if he intends to write one, could be around the theme of “the sorrows of being a Chinese”.

  33. 蓮姐/塵廳長: You’ve got yourself a fan!

    見龍兄: Excellent points! The rule of thumb living in a tyrannical country is to know what to say but not to do; know what not to say but do.

    Cat Lover: You could count me in along with 足球迷兄, 蓮姐, and yourself.

  34. cytodex,

    Sorry to paste this again, but since “There are not a few governments in the world" was mentioned, here are some:

    In Valeria’s case, it is more sad to be an American:
    US Administration leaked her own CIA agent, Valeria Plame, in 2005
    http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/rove_cia_agent_leak_leads_to_rove.htm

    Canada born Khadr was seriously wounded by US solider shot from behind while unarmed, he was then framed and locked up by US military when he was only 15 in 2002, until now, no fair court process. Egypt, Canada, USA have not help to release him.
    http://www.thestar.com/article/300329
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Khadr

  35. Ignoring Mr Ching is a spy or not, glad that he can be released before CNY and have gathering with his family.

  36. No need to be sorry.

    I don’t follow Khadr’s story a lot. There are a couple of things I’ve known so far

    (1) His father was one of the senior associate with Bin Laden.

    (2) Omar himself was even trained in the terrorist camp in Afghanistan.

    (3) His other family members and his blood brother told CBC that he was willing to kill again if he was allowed to go back.

    (4) The U.S accused that Omar threw a grenade that killed a Marine medic at that time before he was wounded and apprehended.

    If your objective is to bring up how hypocritical the U.S is, Khadr’s case alone is not very strong enough. The matter of fact is that whether the U.S should be able to trial him as an adult. For he was just a boy at the time of his capture, the International Laws do not allow any country to trial an underage.

    I don’t know how it can be compared with Mr. Ching so-called “espionage" conviction here.

  37. cytodex,

    Obviously you have not read the links or news, and express your dated opinions. Whatever your dated opinions, I think you have forgotten Khadr was 15 when he was kidnapped. There are also a lot of “kid" soldiers in the world, mostly in Africa, do they all deserve to be put in prison with no open trial at 15? Is it human? I sure don’t want this happen to any kid, no matter what he/she did. And to anyone, anyone anywhere all deserve an open trial.

    http://www.thestar.com/article/300329
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Khadr
    Pls note the “He felt":

    The five-page secret document is based on an interview with the man who shot Khadr twice in the back. Identified only as OC-1, the witness described to an interviewer what he saw after the grenade was thrown in the July 27, 2002 attack.

    “He heard moaning coming from the back of the compound. The dust rose up from the ground and began to clear, he then saw a man facing him lying on his right side," the report states.

    “The man had an AK-47 on the ground beside him and the man was moving. OC-1 fired one round striking the man in the head and the movement ceased. Dust was again stirred by this rifle shot. When the dust rose, he saw a second man sitting up facing away from him leaning against the brush. This man, later identified as Khadr, was moving . . . OC-1 fired two rounds both of which struck Khadr in the back."

    A Pentagon spokesperson would not confirm whether OC-1 was part of Speer’s Delta Force team, the other military units involved in the attack, or from another U.S. agency such as the CIA.

    The report also states that OC-1 deduced that it was Khadr who threw the grenade due to his position, and because the other man was firing a rifle at the same time.

    “Based on his extensive combat experience, OC-1 believed that Khadr and the man at the back of the alley with the AK rifle were the only two alive at the time of the assault. He felt that due to the grenade being thrown simultaneously to the directed rifle fire that the grenade was thrown by someone other than the man who was firing the rifle."

  38. 食得咸魚抵得渴! 宗教狂熱者有他自已的一本聖經! 政治狂熱者亦有他的自已一套!

    你可憐他的遭遇,當事人可能笑你多事!

    悲春哀秋似清高,為賦新詞強說愁!

  39. 見龍兄及又愛又恨:黑不分君:

    恭祝兩位新年快樂, 身體健康!

    見龍兄:

    黑白君和我的溝通一直沒有問題, 雖在很多(不是全部)問題上, 見解不盡相同, 但彼此明白和尊重對方的看法. 在持這麼”堅定”立塲支持中國現政府而不對我惡言相向的網友, 黑白君是少有的一位, 我從一開始便認為他/她是與眾(死硬支持派)不同, 至今我對我這看法, 感到非常悏意.

  40. 悲春哀秋,屋企架電視唔係高清,亞叔唔識愁滋味,新年流流強說愁!得閒飲多兩杯紅酒。

    塵師奶:程翔我就唔識佢,我剩係識清唱,“野…賴相,野…賴相”“Stop! 你唱緊乜野呀”“國語歌黎架,夜來香囉”“唔該較番大D暖氣,好凍呀”

    二十七軍司令員:程翔呢個階級敵人,我早就想同佢清場,當年天安門廣場,我軍出動,一個人也沒有死!

    譚醫師:飲咗呢劑藥,同你清腸。

  41. 見龍在田兄,
    If we think 15-years-old-Khadr’s case is “食得咸魚抵得渴! 宗教狂熱者有他自已的一本聖經! 政治狂熱者亦有他的自已一套!你可憐他的遭遇,當事人可能笑你多事!", and not to help, to support, to fight for fair trial, 這是人治, 而不是法治. In front of the law, everyone is equal and only evidence should be examined. It is not about what one’s race, skin color, religion, believe, if the parents are a bad/rich guy, if the family is a bad/rich one, if one has a bad mouth, if one went thru some crazy training camp(if one does we should help him/her, not to locked up),… I believe this is what we are striving for the world to be法治, and especially China to be 法治, right?

    For the same token, I’m totally against the school’s Zero Tolerance Policy( a thingy from USA). To ban the “bad" boy/girl from school, exactly put them in further exposure to bad thing, which is totally against education as a way to nurture young generation. To keep them away from school is to dump them, and show them unforgiveness is “the" way of life, which is totally wrong.

    Cat Lover,
    Thanks a lot for the good words. I’m male🙂

    Proverbs 31:9 Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.

  42. 嘩嘩,發生咩事!冇上黎兩日,又腥風血雨咁嘅?!上回明明講到程翔由廣州一條友搭緊直通火車落香港,點解下回突然間會去咗阿富汗,又自殺式手榴彈又背脊射槍又15歲又賓拉登,睇到我口震震牙痕痕,但又搭唔到嘴,咪喇,都係走先!

  43. 埃及矞阿蓋達高級頭目的十五歲兒子離開出生及自小長大的地方往阿富汗參與聖戰軍事訓練,其後在一次反恐行動中被射擊及逮捕.

    該少年的行動有其背後推動力,我們可以不同意,但是可尊重的! 這正是 [食得咸魚抵得渴! 宗教狂熱者有他自已的一本聖經! 政治狂熱者亦有他的自已一套!]

    講 [人道] 還說得通, 講甚麼 [人治], [法治], 甚至 [China to be 法治] 在此事件似乎扯得遠一些!!

    你可憐他的遭遇,當事人可能笑你多事!

    悲春哀秋似清高,為賦新詞強說愁!

  44. hello

  45. HAPPY NEW YEAR!

  46. 辱華呀辱華呀!! 如果廁所長起度,佢實最鐘意講呢D嘢, 加拿大白鬼辱華又一例證!

    華婦公園遭3巨犬狂噬
    手腳臂被咬出血洞 狗主攜狗不顧而去

    【明報專訊】北約克一名華裔女居民日前沿士刁路夾里斯利街的公園小徑跑步之時﹐突然遭一名散步者的3頭巨犬襲擊﹐3犬不但把其推倒在地﹐更向其發狂噬咬近足足1分鐘﹔而狗主事後更竟帶同狗隻不顧而去﹐把血流如注的女事主撇於現場。女事主即時抄下了狗主的車牌編號交予警方﹐但事隔3日卻仍音訊全無﹐目前就連狗隻是否染有瘋狗症亦未知。
    (全文:http://www.mingpaotor.com/htm/News/20080209/tba1.htm)

    白鬼無良!差佬無能!天下烏鴉一樣黑,天下屎坑一樣臭!
    真係諷刺! D鬼佬,有三兩隻狗起公園食錯粒老鼠藥瓜咗柴,就鋪天蓋地咁,搞到又要出動成隊人馬去搜個公園,又發哂警告,又貼告示,又要巡查係咪有人要毒害D狗,鬼咁大陣仗,低B嘅!而家有個人比狗咬到咁,佢地就反而不聞不問!人命賤定狗命賤?

  47. 塵廳長:
    呢單野有車牌號碼應該好易搵到放狗人,bite and run罪加一等,狗就罰充公,轉送去大陸,佢地識得善待寵物架嘞,狗主就罰去南韓,做義工屠狗輩一年,餐餐食飯,狗肉三味,好唔好?

  48. 呢件狗咬人事件令我更加懷念廁所長及一本政經,起碼廁所長正義地嘈吵一輪,家豪兄會找有關政府部門及吳氏姊妹花諮詢及追究責任,還被害人一個公道,現在好似已經沒有這些正義敢言之傳媒人士了 (要不左不右不前不後,全世界都冇人夠胆定這個標準,因每個人的左右前後標準都有差異,聽眾們都各有政治立場,主持人沒有可能100%平衡)。唉!

    一本政經幾時復活?非常期待!!

  49. 探 針 : 誰 會 替 陸 建 華 說 半 句 話 ?程 翔 上 周 二 終 於 獲 得 假 釋 , 結 束 了 千 多 天 獄 煎 熬 。 但 不 要 忘 記 跟 他 「 同 案 」 的 中 國 社 科 院 社 會 學 家 陸 建 華 博 士 同 樣 因 為 莫 須 有 罪 名 在 二 ○ ○ 六 年 收 監 , 而 且 因 為 他 是 內 地 人 被 判 二 十 年 重 刑 。 假 如 程 翔 是 因 為 香 港 各 界 以 至 國 外 新 聞 團 體 大 力 聲 援 而 獲 得 相 對 「 人 道 」 待 遇 的 話 , 陸 卻 可 能 在 八 方 沉 默 中 萬 劫 難 赦 ; 一 位 只 有 四 十 七 歲 的 難 得 人 才 就 這 樣 變 成 無 法 無 天 政 權 的 犧 牲 品 。

    陸 建 華 判 囚 申 訴 無 門
    筆 者 早 年 在 大 陸 採 訪 時 認 識 陸 博 士 , 曾 向 他 請 有 關 國 情 , 尤 其 是 社 會 各 階 層 對 改 革 開 放 政 策 的 反 應 。 九 七 年 後 , 他 常 來 香 港 向 本 地 學 者 探 討 「 一 國 兩 制 」 的 問 題 ; 而 且 他 為 中 央 部 委 寫 過 不 少 內 參 , 多 半 是 建 議 中 共 高 層 對 港 人 、 包 括 「 反 對 派 」 的 民 主 訴 求 採 取 包 容 態 度 。 老 陸 是 「 制 度 內 改 革 者 」 , 他 不 會 一 廂 情 願 地 鼓 吹 西 方 式 民 主 ; 但 是 他 不 認 同 中 共 內 依 然 龐 大 的 「 寧 左 勿 右 」 勢 力 。 他 對 香 港 那 些 純 粹 因 為 商 業 利 益 而 百 般 討 好 北 大 人 的 「 突 然 愛 國 者 」 尤 其 看 不 過 眼 。
    據 了 解 , 陸 在 香 港 朋 友 不 少 , 有 個 別 專 業 人 士 亦 趁 跟 他 交 流 的 機 會 , 向 他 查 問 一 些 國 內 人 事 與 政 策 方 面 的 資 料 。 但 老 陸 是 見 過 世 面 的 學 者 , 據 他 的 好 友 介 紹 , 他 從 不 會 向 人 透 露 內 部 文 件 或 講 話 。 國 內 安 全 與 司 法 部 門 聲 稱 陸 曾 向 程 翔 「 售 賣 」 絕 密 消 息 , 但 拿 不 出 有 說 服 力 的 證 據 。 試 想 , 國 安 部 炮 製 有 關 程 的 頭 一 份 「 犯 罪 清 單 」 就 因 為 錯 漏 百 出 而 不 獲 檢 察 院 接 受 ; 而 最 後 提 交 法 院 的 起 訴 書 跟 早 前 新 華 社 根 據 內 部 消 息 編 撰 有 關 程 翔 「 墮 落 」 經 過 的 大 話 文 章 又 有 巨 大 差 別 !
    從 法 理 邏 輯 看 , 既 然 當 局 對 程 翔 的 指 控 不 盡 不 實 , 那 麼 有 關 陸 向 程 提 供 「 猛 料 」 的 所 謂 罪 狀 就 更 不 可 信 。 到 今 天 , 北 京 政 法 部 門 一 直 沒 有 公 開 陸 博 士 究 竟 非 法 取 得 甚 麼 材 料 、 洩 露 了 甚 麼 國 家 機 密 等 最 起 碼 的 資 訊 。 對 陸 與 他 家 人 不 利 的 地 方 是 , 他 們 既 沒 有 「 境 外 聲 援 」 , 又 拿 不 到 國 內 的 法 律 援 助 ; 陸 被 重 判 後 也 申 訴 無 門 。 更 離 譜 的 是 , 有 關 方 面 一 直 向 外 散 佈 打 擊 陸 個 人 誠 信 的 黑 材 料 , 包 括 他 跟 安 全 部 「 素 有 聯 繫 」 , 或 他 曾 多 次 「 冒 充 」 胡 錦 濤 近 身 智 囊 等 。 在 獲 知 程 翔 假 釋 的 消 息 後 , 陸 夫 人 除 了 表 示 對 程 的 祝 願 外 , 暗 示 他 丈 夫 的 處 境 堪 憂 。

    港 人 有 義 務 為 陸 說 話
    姑 且 不 論 陸 有 關 香 港 的 內 參 文 章 對 香 港 民 主 進 程 有 沒 有 貢 獻 , 從 捍 衞 法 治 的 觀 點 看 , 港 人 有 義 務 為 陸 博 士 說 幾 句 話 。 不 要 忘 記 在 中 港 高 度 融 合 的 今 天 , 數 以 十 萬 計 的 香 港 居 民 經 常 在 大 陸 公 幹 。 在 胡 溫 政 權 拿 不 出 勇 氣 去 以 法 治 代 替 人 治 之 前 , 每 個 港 人 , 包 括 新 聞 界 以 至 時 常 要 處 理 牽 涉 「 內 部 」 材 料 的 律 師 、 會 計 師 等 專 業 人 士 與 非 政 府 組 織 人 員 都 有 可 能 墮 入 法 律 陷 阱 , 身 入 囹 圄 ! 要 知 道 假 釋 一 個 程 翔 只 不 過 是 北 京 的 公 關 遊 戲 , 中 國 法 治 問 題 遠 遠 沒 有 解 決 !

    林 和 立
    中 國 問 題 評 論 員

  50. Forgiveness- Ian Stewart
    http://journalismforum.fims.uwo.ca/keynotes.aspx#stewart
    On Jan. 10, 1999 his reporting career came to a sudden end when a single bullet from an AK-47 fired by a boy soldier in Sierra Leone punched through Stewart’s skull and lodged at the back of his brain. That wound left him partially paralyzed and clinging to a 20 percent chance of survival. In his book, Ambushed (Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, 2002) Stewart tells of his recovery both from the bullet and from crippling emotional scars that afflicted him after years of witnessing humanity’s carnage and destruction. Now a doctoral student at the University of Michigan, Stewart is focusing his energies on studying the effects of trauma on former child soldiers, their families and communities in Sierra Leone and Liberia.

  51. Anyone watched the HK news this morning? 程翔 met the press, and spoke to the public. He did not deny he had taken money from Taiwan.
    According to law of a lot of modern nations (including US, Canada, HK,..), one has to be able to explain and prove one’s income and wealth.

    One has to reflect as why a lot of people love one’s own country and can do contribution to one’s own country with success, including people in mainland China, but only 程翔 got into trouble? 劉銳紹 & 李子誦 together with 程翔 創辦《當代》雜誌, 劉銳紹 & 李子誦 have never been arrested, right?

  52. there are so many middle east people in Canada, why only Khadr got into trouble? right?

  53. R8, please try to see if you can repeat your saying to anyone you meet on the street🙂
    I ‘m so happy coz I can repeat anything I wrote here to anyone I meet on the street.

  54. If you love freedom, love Western Government election style, love the justice system, (all 3 of these I like them too), you must know the justice system protect the minor (Khadr is), woman, and assume everyone is INNOCENT before one is subjected to fair trial. So you can prove Khadr is NOT innocent?
    Khadr is not a soldier, a child soldier is not a soldier in International law. He is not having fair trial. Australia already got her prsion in Guantanamo back home for trail, there is no more Western country nationality prisoner, except Khadr. Why Khadr is not coming back to Canada for trial? I think there was a terrorist caught in China, who is a Canadian, but China do not recognize double nationality so once he was in China, he was arrested. This is agreeable to international law, Japan will do the same. But I think I’ve heard a lot of folks here screamed. Double standard?


發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s

分類

%d 位部落客按了讚: