發文作者:kahoo | 七月 14, 2007

DISASTER: New Chinese Car Crash Test


Responses

  1. 嘩大佬﹐咩車黎架?! post埋D咁嘅clip﹐我心血少﹐唔嚇得呀﹐幾驚連個假人嘅頭都飛埋出黎呀!

  2. 好心個D 成日幫中共講好話, o r鐘意舔中共嘅人水平高番D 啦!

  3. (1) Wonder if it is a Chevy and whether Canadian/American regulations (if any) would allow cars like that to be driven in N. America.

    (2) Speaking of 中共 officials, when the day the officials switch from Mercedes Benz/Lexus/BMW to whatever this brand will be 10 years or 20 years later, then it would be safe to consider it.

    (3) All industrialized country of the G7 countries (not sure if Russia sells theirs overseas) make cars and sell them overseas. When this brand’s improved and becomes available here, I highly recommend to my leftist fellows here, it’s time to show your heartfelt patriotism and back up your words with action. I mean, there isn’t any excuse not to embrace the marvelous industrialization of your “home” country.

    P.S. Cat Lover: Thanks for your points in previous thread. I will respond to your post later.

  4. 大陸d商人都幾種意顏色下,孔雀石绿, 哨基夫喃, 蘇丹紅…..講真食物黎講我support china-free. 大佬, 佢地唔係係d fancy野度加料喎, 係d日常基本食物度加, 我諗無論一個人點愛國都好, 點都唔會食d知道自己國家出產有毒嘅食物掛. 睇完條片, 我覺得架車好似用鋁黎做嫁, 壓到咁(同汽水罐冇乜分別),點賣呀? 有一分都偷笑啦. 面就人地比, 假就自己丟, 大陸乜假都自己丟哂啦. 有好嚴嘅條例, 唔做又有咩用?

  5. cytodex :

    1. Heard that it is Chrysler which is considering to “private brand" Chinese made cars and imoort into North America.

    2. Still remember back in the “good old days" (before 改革開放") when China was still considered as “iron curtain"? Mao and Deng were riding in Chinese made “紅旗牌" 轎車. 不知為何, 改革開放後, 崇洋媚外不止是百姓的玩意, 連
    中共 officials 都 Mercedes Benz/Lexus/BMW 起來.

    3. 舉腳讚成! 維園阿伯 “才查" “華晨BS" 的話, 我就寫個服字!

    4. 最新消息: 得悉華人教會一些知名人仕的學位也有 弄虛作假的情況. Stay tuned. I should have something update in my own blog later tonight.

  6. 絕對同意cytodex的第三點,左加拿大有許多"極"度愛國人士,無論祖國發生任何錯事,必用歪論或其他方法為其辯護,祖國應該表揚一下這些人士,每人贈送一部國產汽車以示謝意,這些愛國人士必会樂意接受來表示愛國心。

  7. From what the video clip shows, it looks like the major weaknesses of this Chinese made vehicle are at the chassis underframe and the roof pillars. The crumple zone also probably doesn’t absorb enough force due to collision so the impact is ultimately transferred to snap the roof pillars and bend the underframe.

    Given that designing and building a vehicle is no easy job to do, Chinese automakers should learn a thing or two from the successes and failures of the major automakers in the world, i.e. BMW, Mercedes Benz, Toyota, Honda, GM and Ford.

    Take BMW’s success as an example, their steel cage design ensures that the passenger cabin can sustain a couple of rollovers without any of the supporting pillars snapping or bending significantly and thereby protecting the occupants inside the vehicle. One of the most remarkable designs is probably the Smartcar’s steel cage, which, despite its size, almost defies common sense as being one of the safest vehicles around.

    At the other end of the spectrum, auto manufacturer as stubborn as Ford that has been known to repeat the same design flaws year after year, model after model, has also corrected the problem on the Ford Taurus that used to have its roof pillars collapsing during rollover.

    One more noteworthy example is Hyundai that has gone from zero to hero in merely twenty years. In some instances, their design and quality control now even surpasses their Japanese counterparts.

    Adding reinforced bars, strengthening the angle points and joints, improving galvanized steel quality, and so on could easily turn the table around for Chinese manufacturers, thanks to their low labour cost and relatively short learning curves.

    At any rate, I’ll follow Cytodex brother’s advice and wait until our leftist friends show their patriotism AND survive their first experiences with these Chinese-made vehicles before I would willingly jump in or even go near one of these beasts.

    RUN, my friend, RUN, next time when you see one of these Chinese-made “tofu vehicles" within your field of vision!

  8. One more thing. In all fairness, when a youtube video clip is entitled “Chinese Car Crash Test", is the account holder already trying to perpetrate the stereotype that ALL Chinese-made products are not trustworthy? Why is the make and model of this vehicle not mentioned anywhere next to that video clip? Although highly unlikely, what if another Chinese-made vehicle from, say, Red Flag rolled off the assembly line and scored five stars in all crash tests tomorrow? Are people going to see this as just another “Chinese Car” because that previous “Chinese Car” didn’t pass the crash test so this is just another “Chinese Car” that we should not buy?

    Being Chinese ourselves, we have to be extremely vigilant of these things happening because we could be making a fool of ourselves when we also perpetrate the stereotype that “all Chinese-made products are just smoke and mirrors”.

    By the way, I have an alternate explanation complementing the interesting “one leg walking capitalistically and another leg walking socialistically” analogy but I think I have said enough for one day so I’ll hold off until some other time to post it.

  9. 紙皮小籠包知識產權維護運動

    北京大廚司發明了紙皮餡小籠包, 相信是中國繼
    指南車,造紙,火藥,印刷術之後又一偉大發明,
    對人類生活及末來影響極大,
    可惜一下子被那些無知的中共官僚打壓下去了。

    其實能把紙皮制成食物應該是
    人類能生存在地球上
    而不至滅亡的一個很好的出路。
    從食物資源方面看,
    人類人口不斷增加,食物不足,必須找新來源。
    發達地區的人因吃肉太多而導至過肥,
    吃高纖低脂的紙皮食品最有纖體作用。
    在環保方面,
    世界各大城市都為如何棄掉大量紙制品
    而大傷腦筋,
    將其造成物食便可解決了。
    養豬所產生的廢物,對造成環境污染是一大原兇,
    用紙皮代替了豬肉,可減少養豬,對環保幫助很大。

    最近中國豬肉價格飛漲,窮苦人家真是食無肉,
    紙皮代肉降低成本則人人受惠。

    報導指紙皮餡小籠包很美味,
    因此應還可制成紙皮水餃,紙皮雲吞,紙皮叉燒包,
    紙皮燒肉,蒸,煮,煎,炸,等等中國食品,
    而加以改良更可代替了任何肉類,則處更大。
    有人說吃紙皮沒營養,其實只要把廚司請到中央科研院,
    派大量食物研究專家協助,作重點發展項目,
    不過數年定必成功,制出更富營養的美味食品,震驚世界!

    又有人說吃紙皮惡心,其實是無知之言。
    最近美國太空總署決定,
    斥資1900萬美元為國際太空站購置一套俄羅斯製廁所系統。
    這套新廁所設備還能將太空人的尿轉化成飲用水,
    不再像之前的廁所系統那樣把小便向宇宙空間排放。
    美國最精英的人可飲尿制成的水,
    中國人為何不可吃紙制成的食物?

    你亦可能說紙皮成份可能有毒素!
    這亦可容易解決,只要完全由外國進口(China Free)便可!

    至於為何中共會打壓這個偉大發明呢?
    在下想到以下幾個可能性:
    1. 中共早已把這個科技產品列為一級國家機密,
    現被體報導了出來, 唯有將計就計把廚司轉移到官裹去。
    2. 地方貪官勾結外國跨國快餐集團把這新技術打倒,
    以除去新競爭。
    3. 有些領導層人物或其親屬(如太子黨)想將這新發明的知識產權據為已有,
    而先把發明者拿起來,秘密繼續研究,圖謀暴利。
    4. 紙皮包是假的,根本沒有這事,是大陸媒體的炒作,
    以示執法人員為人民除害立功。
    5, 是外國勢力造謠,無中生有,別有用心,破壞中國名譽。

    最後,請各位愛中國文化(食品),環保分子,
    經濟專家,扶貧人士,維權鬥士
    聯合起來維護那位大廚司的知識產權及人權!

  10. 曾經有個教授用垃圾做肉丸,有人話係偉大發明。
    而家只不過纸皮做包,其實只要下次用D靚D嘅乾
    淨紙皮,我都唔知有乜問題!豬肉包冇規定要有豬
    肉,老婆餅都冇必要同老婆有關。

  11. 慢感人:

    豬肉包冇規定要有豬肉,
    老婆餅都冇必要同老婆有關。

    Good analogy! Just like “Singapore Fried Rice Vermicelli" is not originated in Singapore!

  12. I agree with 獨孤 brother’s reflection on not putting ourselves bashing Chinese products for they are made in China.

    To present a more balanced view, there is definitely some great stuff. (1) Chinese Medicine: I mean from its philosophical point of view (Yin-Yang, etc), not necessarily the herbs/animal carcasses you buy. (2) Tai Chi: a healthy aerobic exercise and you can sweat like a pig (even in slow movement). (3) Calligraphy: Nobody will write the Chinese characters in simplified Chinese. (4) The Art of War: A must read for all military colleges and even MBA courses.

    They are just a few examples of Chinese treasures left by our ancestors. For 50 something years, I have yet to see if there are any good thing that can come from Communism.

  13. 曾幾何時,日本貨是"化學"的代名詞,曰本車是單簿,鋼水差,
    冇力,冇款,平車的代表。現在己是精確、品質、設計的保証!
    以國家為品牌的如法國香水,古巴雪卡,意大利時裝,美國香煙,…
    中國貨别人怎看,睇你自己爭唔爭氣啦。

  14. 咦, 慢感人兄:

    唔知亞旺正傳定邊套無線劇集好似話老婆餅係個老公為佢老婆而發明個噃, 有冇咁「樹」呢? 定係無線為劇情需要而又老作呢?

    廢苦兄:

    原來我其中一樣最愛—星洲炒米—唔係麥之華嘅原產地嘅傑作嚟嘅, 咁其實係乜洲發明嘅呢?

    Cytodex 兄:

    四點中國國髓亦的確是。 除咗書法之所 (因為小弟寫極中文字都咁醜樣), 其餘三樣都好想學。 正是最近本想到圖書舘找本類似「孫子兵法」或「商業上之孫子兵法」, 揾唔到, 但揾到一本「用三國演義看商業策畧」(actually, I can’t remember the exact title), 亦相當精彩, 值得推介。

    亦好同意兄台前一版講共產黨的文革禍害。 記得70年代在香港裕華國貨問一售貨員, 點解以前d康樂棋質料冇咁差嘅。 售貨員話: 『以前就好, 而家你想知點解變得咁差, 去問吓鄧小平啦!』 我相信60年代文革之後, 中國人真係完全失去方向, 無法, 無神, 無可信賴嘅領導, 再加上知識份子下放嘅下放, 打壓嘅打壓, 到現在一解除束縛變番做「走資派」博命抓銀, 就好多人用文革式嘅無知, 無恥, 同冇良心做事, 只求包装得好好睇睇, 入面係空心嘅或有毒嘅亦唔知或唔理。唉….

  15. 求丙兄:
    無線班編劇怎會識歷史,所謂歷史都是以"寫",
    “作"為主,如有雷同,實屬巧合。
    或者曾經有一個係為老婆做,又或者係老婆婆因
    為冇牙所以做輭餅出來。都已無楷考了。
    星洲炒米是住在長洲的摩囖"星",將珈哩雞改良,
    自行硑發而成。
    意大利粉原產地都不是意大利,是傳自偉大祖國。

  16. 慢感人兄:

    原來如此。 Thanks!

  17. The differences are beginning to emerge after the average desk body and a very harmonious, in our view, a modern silhouette touring: fast, with notes sportivnosti and at the same time vmestitelnogo and cozy…


發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s

分類

%d 位部落客按了讚: