發文作者:kahoo | 四月 11, 2007

今晚嘉賓: 劉天賜 / 主題: 香港新聞戲劇化

精彩重溫:

Part 1 (starts at 15:00):

http://www.torontofirstradio.com/archive.asp?filename=ampart12-4-11-2007.asf

Part 2:
http://www.torontofirstradio.com/archive.asp?filename=ampart13-4-11-2007.asf

Part 3:
http://www.torontofirstradio.com/archive.asp?filename=ampart14-4-11-2007.asf

Part 4:
http://www.torontofirstradio.com/archive.asp?filename=ampart15-4-11-2007.asf


Responses

  1. Simon, Dr. So, Andy & Buddies of this blog,

    I would like to seek your opinions on CCTV’s acceptance of an advertisement of a retailer of jewels and watches in Hong Kong which was reported by the TV station’s reporter to be selling counterfeit goods. Just a few days ago, a reporter of the station reported that the retailer had had malpractices in some business transactions but an advertisement of the retailer claiming the company has good reputation and is trustworthy is being aired by the station. Will audience be confused? Is it appropriate for CCTV to air this advertisement?

    家豪, 蘇博士, 木言 和此區的老友記們:

    你們對中央電視台接受香港一家曾被該台記者報導售賣假貨的珠寶錶行播放廣告有什麼意見? 只是數日前, 該台記者報導那家店舖有不當的銷售行為, 可是該台現正播放一個廣告, 說那店舖有良好信譽和值得信賴. 觀眾會否因而混淆了.中央電視台播放這廣告恰當嗎?

  2. Correction:

    The last sentence of my last entry should read ‘Is it acceptable to you to air this advertisement by CCTV at this time?’

    更正:

    我上一篇留言的最後一句應為’中央電視台在這時播放這廣告, 你可以接受嗎?


發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s

分類

%d 位部落客按了讚: