發文作者:kahoo | 三月 25, 2007

煲呔649票 VS 袋巾123票

早特備節目: 《香港特首選舉直擊》
AM770/ 週日早上10-12

香港第三屆特首選舉於325 (今日) 舉行。

多倫多第一台AM 770本星期日朝早10點至中午12,即時分析選戰結果,直擊追訪身處香港的評論人,並全面開放熱線,接聽大家電話。開放熱線: 905-737-1540

主持
: 李家豪、木然、譚志強博士

電台頻率:
AM 770

網上收聽:
http://www.TorontoFirstRadio.com

周星馳 + 黎明 + 古巨基 + Stephy.. 齊挺曾蔭權?

角逐連任的香港特首曾蔭權 在灣仔修頓球場舉行造勢晚會,邀請一眾明星,包括周星馳、黎明、鄧麗欣、古巨基等上台為他造勢。周星馳直到造勢大會尾聲才上台,獲曾蔭權熱烈歡迎:

黎明西鐵火警中救人車長劉慶遠齊挺曾。 認得右邊的人是誰嗎? 前電視司儀劉志榮是也﹗

 


Source: Apple Daily


Responses

  1. 嘩,點解咁樣衰?
    一個笑騎騎,一個睜大眼;咁攪法,香港唔多好!

  2. 皇皇中央,廣愛育民,香港我土,吐哺慈航,誰是特首,關鍵在仁

  3. 曾 Sir 贏晒

  4. 從相片看曾是有一點激動, 而梁則笑得開朗. 但總不能說是樣衰吧. 就算他們樣衰, 和香港會唔多好有什麼關係? 特首候選人作辯論, 相信凡是關心香港和想香港的民主向前走的人都會認為是好事, 而這兩位候選人的表現是值得讚賞. 他們這樣攪法, 香港肯定會好.

  5. 大佬,人人都可以睇相,咁呢個世界仲有高人,仲有卧龍!!
    兩個樣,對立呀媽!仲有呀,呢場戲嚟,上一次揾楊鐵梁,今次揾袋巾梁,全部大家私底下同中央知會左係做戲比人睇,梁自己都係中央特派香港特別行政區特別人員,你知唔知呀!!!

  6. 我明白你所說的樣衰的潛在語是說他們都是心懷不軌, 只為自己利益而不是為香港人的意思. 但他們這次的特首辯論的確是為港人民主道路作出貢獻. 如果說梁受中國政府指使來做戲給港人看, 我相信這秘密只有你知, 連梁本人也未必知. 拿楊鐵樑和梁家傑來比較, 恐怕相同之處只是他們都是法津界人士吧. 不要忘記第一次選舉特首還有吳光正. 難道楊和吳都是受命於中國政府來做戲給港人看的? 可能你的想像力太豐富了吧!

  7. 同你講多都side氣!將我的嘢亂咁講,我話佢地樣衰,你就講成心懷不軌;樣衰就樣衰,個樣呀,明唔明!
    閃呀!
    袋巾係中央特派香港特別行政區特別人員,你有權唔信,NOMB(NONE OF MY BUSSINESS)

  8. 家豪:
    今天收聽你主持的非常政經, 其中一位香港的女評論員(沒有留意她的名字), 說因梁家傑在候選特首辯論中沒有提及十八日普選遊行而對他感到失望. 我有一個想法, 會不會是大會不容許梁在會上提及這次遊行. 如可能的話, 請查證我這個想法. 如果真的如此, 請轉告那女評論員, 她將來的評論自會更精確和中肯.

  9. 你所指的樣衰,我真係唔明. 我理解為相由心生, 如果樣貎是衰(惡形惡相吧),是做了虧心事, 或正在做壞事吧.
    這平台是給大家說說話, 可以平心靜氣, 理性分析, 也可以無的放矢, 做生草藥, 不須查證, 隨主觀意願說一番, 人家不信, 不必負責, 當然是NOYB(None of your business)啦!

  10. 我再推敲你說樣衰的意思, 可能你是指曾和梁在掹貓尾, 一個做好, 一個做醜. 再加上你後來補充說梁是受命於中國政府, 那這套戲的導演自是中國政府. 真的想像力豐富, 極富創意.可惜說來隠晦, 何不直接說出來, 讓我等反應遲緩的人, 不用花時間去弄明你的創見.

  11. Should change the title from “Chief Executive Election Debate" to “Chief Executive Appointment Debate"?

  12. 話知佢地點玩呀,點選呀,關我地咩嘢事呀,人又老錢又無,係加拿大多倫多做九等不如公民,華人個袋又臭又賤,唔係老翻,賣淫,賣氣槍,賣A貨B貨C貨,就係做農務種草種藥用大麻,的華人政客撈家,九唔搭八,英文又唔識講又唔識聽,淨係依起一副狗臉,咁就做倒柿長,廁所長,你話唔死都有新聞聽啦,弱智都知係攪笑啦!
    所以唔好鬧香港咁多,要鬧就鬧呢到的先啦,真係攪笑都碌地,有個咁小醜陳國治,華人真係小醜民族!見到佢我即刻覺得好無自尊呀!都唔知點算?

  13. 加拿大美國英國,暴行國家,世界齊聲討責,好,好,真理長存,入侵依拉克暴行,永留臭史!!
    克里靖反對參戰,名留千古加國歷史!!
    —————
    譴責美加領袖 加各大城市爆反戰示威

    加通社電
    美軍入侵伊拉克4年之際,加拿大各大城市周六爆發反戰示威,譴責伊拉克衝突及加拿大在阿富汗的使命。
    示威遊行在全國各地舉行,包括多倫多、哈里法斯、滿地可、渥太華、咸美頓(Hamilton)及溫尼辟等城市。
    在哈里法斯,大約100名抗議者高舉「團結一致、反對戰爭」(Together Against War)的標語,在灰色的天空下,通過哈里法斯市中心,然後在一處公園舉行集會。演講者中包括前美國海軍陸戰隊士兵沃爾柯特(Dean Walcott),他曾經在伊拉克服役,目前正申請加拿大難民身分,因為他堅持反戰立場。
    不需西方勢力干預
    25歲的沃爾柯特向人群說,每個國家有權決定自己的命運,不需要西方勢力的干預。沃爾柯特曾經兩次前往伊拉克執行任務,但他於去年12月離開部隊,悄悄登上一輛前往多倫多的巴士。

  14. 打佢六折,四成稅,年薪淨銀都$60000啦;仲有福利,補時,豬多優惠,行行企企,夜飲豪情,捉華人氣槍,作吓故仔話有人入你屋企打劫,強行入屋搜查,嚇死你呀,無法無天;作故仔都用吓腦呀,話比人知剛剛遇著巧巧,發覺可疑人物,然後入屋拉可疑人物,發現毒品竇;唉,弱智先至信你啦;咁好人工,係我都做啦,話知做狗臉,做貓臉!加拿大咁多政客,唔怪得知的國債多到嚇死人,就係好多人掠水咯!!亂用錢咯,廣告醜聞就知係咩嘢一回事啦,官商勾結!!
    —————-
    多市708警察年薪逾10萬
    較前年人數多倍半 2007年3月19日
    廣 告

    【明報專訊】一份即將在本周四提交多倫多警政委員會的報告透露,多倫多警隊在去年共有708名警官的年收入突破10萬元大關,與2005年和2004年相比,年收入超過10萬元的警官人數大幅升﹐比前一年多出一倍半,主要原因是因一次性地領取補發工資。

    根據安省相關法律(所謂陽光法案),在省內公共服務部門工作的人員,凡年薪超過10萬元者,其名單將向公眾公開。而一份即將在本周四提交多倫多警政委員會報告透露,多倫多警隊在去年共有708名警官的年收入超過了10萬元,其中有571名警官的基本年薪原本低於10萬元。

    例如:多倫多警察總長布萊爾(Bill Blair)在2006年的年收入有261,304元,副警察總長德里(Kim Derry)的年收入亦達191,671元。至於年收入最高的警員則為戈貝爾(Nad Goebell),其在2006年的收入高達137,808元。

    在2004年和2005年,多倫多警隊年收入超過10萬元的警官分別只有240人和279人,在人數上尚未達到2006年的一半。

    對此,多倫多警隊發言人皮尤施(Mark Pugash)分析說,年收入超過10萬元的警官人數在2006年大幅升,主要原因是一次性地領取補發工資。

    他指出,多倫多警隊在2005年底與多倫多警政聯會及資深警官組織正式簽署為期3年的集體合約,該份合約將在2007年末到期,而大部分警官是在2006年初一次性地領取補發工資,導致他們當年的收入大幅增加。至於其他原因還包括:每年加薪和超時工作等。

    皮尤施還特別強調,在上述年收入超過10萬元的708名警官中,年收入低於10.1萬元共有75人,年收入低於10.5萬元的共有250人。

    根據多倫多警隊網站所發布的資料,警官的年收入包括基本薪金、假期薪金、病假薪金、補發薪金以及超時工作報酬和出庭報酬等。至於一名警官的基本薪金基於其所擁有的工作經驗,介乎於50,057.71元至71,522.91元之間。

  15. 樓上仁兄:絕對有理
    低下層小市民我,由六個七毫半做到而家八蚊人工,做左十年八載;
    真係無臉目見街東父老;用盡老本谷糧;再等十年八載先至有資格攞養老金,攞到養老金都唔夠開支,交地稅都無咁一忽,真係要食豬肉撈飯
    奉勸各位新移民,新移民係即係新勞工,新勞動力,新苦力,新低下層勞工,所以八蚊一個鐘,你地預左係咁上下;最低人工有個普遍性就係華人勞工的稱號,因為佢地大多係八蚊.其它人種,十居八九起薪時薪都高的,無九蚊十蚊都無人做,鬼叫我地係華人咩,見工記住染金毛!!

  16. 個份預算案根本中低下層加拿大人無任何受惠;只不過係灰黨班友得23億;比23億灰人政團買佢地唔好攪事
    買新車回購2000,呢的多餘嚟講,買車唔係益左車行同製車行業;其實係政府補貼比汽車製造業;你地仲要睇清楚係買咩嘢車,咩嘢叫做環保車等等,好多條件限制,味先佢地點照顧自己友呀
    其它都無咩嘢係對普遍市民有利,淨係生仔,生得多,慳得多的,呢的都係揾笨!
    無新意,無任何解決民生的財案;只不過是(政治財案!)政黨交換利益,合法擺上枱將錢清洗到灰黨去!!
    詳情可睇三月十九日the agenda (tvo)檔案;如果有的話!!
    1970年bc省長個老鬼講得唔錯

  17. 45億元改善環保 購節能車退稅2000元
    向「大食車」徵收懲罰稅
    —-(摘自明報)
    有錢買大車,所謂徵收懲罰稅係多餘的;買得貴車,緊係有報稅,有公司支付,有其它安排;點會有阻嚇作用,多此一舉,做戲

  18. 個份預算案根本中低下層加拿大人無任何受惠;只不過係灰黨班友得23億;比23億灰人政團買佢地唔好攪事
    Comment by 預算案 — March 20, 2007 #
    //
    係230億呀!!!!!
    //
    獲撥230億 魁省政客爭邀功 2007年3月20日
    ( 滿地可19日加新社電)聯邦財政預算案承諾增撥230億元給魁北克省﹐

  19. Regardless of who won or who lost, we are witnessing history unfold before our very eyes. This “election" should be seen as the precursor to the 2012 general election hopeful’s forthcoming. Yes, Dr. Tam was absolutely right. Besides keeping our fingers crossed for the 2012 general election, Hong Kong should consider a preemptive strike on the Central Government by parading on the streets regularly (say, every July 1) to voice the opinion of the majority of population that a general one-citizen-one-vote election MUST be held in 2012, before the central government would even think about putting off the 2012 General Election further.
    .
    As Mr. Suen’s military strategy goes, “Knowing your enemy ensures your winning hand”. Since the least that the Communist Party wants to see is that a General Election might be a perfect incubator for a popular political party to be covertly backed by some foreign government (e.g. U.S. Congress or Kuomingtang – the Nationalist Party of Taiwan) Therefore, all political parties in Hong Kong must demonstrate that they are free of outside influences and are working only for the sole benefits of Hong Kong and China. (In retrospect, therefore, Martin Lee’s trip to the U.S. Congress was a really bad move!) This precarious 2012 election is not only important for Hong Kong, it could ultimately fuel political reforms in China if the Community Party finds out that social stability cannot be attained with a “small-circle election” that invites only the rich and famous to be the electorate.
    .
    Great show today, 家豪 & Co., hope I can hear/see your coverage of the 2012 Hong Kong General Election – an unprecedented election on Chinese soil in 5,000 years of Chinese history!
    .

  20. 香港新一屆特首選舉「秀」已塵埃落定,這次選舉由於名義上有對手梁家傑,並有兩回電視辯論,很多人說這迫使曾蔭權面對羣眾,擬定政剛及對將來施政目標作出承諾,是香港的得著云云。

    筆者覺得這次選舉「秀」是否成功是極難下評論,但若單從爭取普選的角度分析,筆者認為是行了倒車。

    雖然筆者認為像社會民主連線的「硬」抗爭 (「硬」是指直率地抗爭而不是激進,因筆者不覺得他們激進),只會令中共更強硬,不會有甚麽妥協的結局,但是以公民黨參予小圈子選舉,試圖感染市民的普選意識,並給中共傳遞平和的普選訴求,消除中共對普選的疑慮,筆者覺得其成效是適得其反。

    自從04年4月人大釋法,為基本法附件一第七條有關修改行政長官產生辦法的程序加設重重附帶條件後 (見:http://www.info. gov.hk/basic_ law/fulltext/ 0406npcsc_ c.pdf),令修改特首產生辦法難若登天,變相已為特首普選設下鞏固的緊箍罩,以後港人的任何抗爭、游說、訴求、甚至哀求也不能逃出這緊箍罩,中共大可在自己的掌握內,因應政情,跟港人玩不同的遊戲,運用不同的策略,以或明或暗的方法去分化、要脅或利誘港人,並透過已歸邊的傳媒混淆是非,凝做似是而非的假像。由於中共掌握所有國家及法制機器,他可以全方位地跟港人「玩嘢」。

    爭取特首普選的港人現要面對兩難的困惑。一方面,抗爭只有帶來對立及緊張,另方面,以平和手段加入小圈子建制圖改變中央領導的觀點也容易變成被中方同化,令中共更易把其熔化入其緊箍罩內。就這次特首選舉而言,很多評論都認為是一大進步,候選人有政剛及有市民參予的辯論令市民感覺良好,好象外國有的,香港也有。在這 Feel Good Factor 的效應下,對小圈子選舉的抗拒也減少,對普選的訴求也不那麽熱切。加上中共已開始在港輿論方面搶先佔領「普選」的解釋權,君不見曾特首把 800 人的小圈子選舉說成是七百萬港人的「選擇」嗎?獲選後,他除了向選委謝票外,還以開篷巴士四出向市民謝票,總之做到跟外國的競選似模似樣,令港人在感覺良好下接受,以後「普選」這口號已不是民主派的專利,曾蔭權將主導港人往他認為「普選」的方案前進,假以時日港人也慢慢接受了這選舉方式,曾蔭權便可象徵性地提議擴大特首選舉委員人數的方案,說是充分反映各階層利的妥協方案,可尤美普選的效果。港人當然不是那麼愚惷相信,但在沒有選擇下,且又想維持社會和諧氣紛,而覺得小圈子選舉又真的不是那麼不濟,便接受現實,就當小圈子選舉是有「香港特色」的「普選」吧。

    縱觀這次選舉,泛民主派明顯已被分化,各民主政黨亦各自盤算,若以政黨利益而言,大贏家當然是公民黨,就算普選未即時實現,他們已從市民取得高分,為下屆立法會選舉贏得不少政治本錢。但若以爭取普選的前景而言,筆者是悲觀的。唯一可能令港人團結一起爭取普選的,就只有在香港經濟及民生出現大幅倒退,而特區政府又無法應付,使市民絕望的情况下,港人才會一致要求普選。

  21. First, I wonder if Donald’s tears are forshadowing what the political future lies ahead for H.K or himself? I am not optimistic with his delivering his promises made during the so-called “election" debates. Sir Donald is indeed walking a thin line here; with the Chinese bosses to please while trying to tame the people’s request of general election. His popularity will suffer dearly if he could not find a “middle" ground for both. Donald is likely to have a hard time “to get the job done".
    .
    Second, I am opt to think that the chinese government will always find all sort of “reasons" to deter any moement toward a general election. Don’t forget, we have a bunch of suddenly patriotic indigenous communists and businessmen who would love acting as Beijing’s parrot. What happens is that they churn out what would be some “consensus" by the pro-Beijing forces that political reform should be done gradually and step by step, H.K is not ready to make a big leap forward to general election…blah.blah.blah. Their reasoning are likely ambiguious and yet hard to quantify. Perhaps, someone might come up with something like having a general election violates the “spirit of the Basic Law" or whatever.
    .
    Third, as 獨孤 brother says. Regardless of the outcome, H.K people should now raise up and voice their demands for more political reform. That by itself will demonstrate the maturity of the H.K general public to be worthy of the general election. In face of all possible distorted views by pro-Beijing forces, let’s have all the universities/institution conduct all sort of surveys and polls to “quantify" the demands of the H.K people over the political reform.

  22. The result is actually really funny.

    Now that the results are in (nothing unexpected right? WRONG!)

    煲呔649票 VS 袋巾123票 That’s pretty normal, however, based on Chinese political leader’s strategy, would it make sense that they would allow these two to commit an act? I firmly feel that it is not the case here.

    based on election rule, the winner becomes the main chairman and the next in line looser, would be the leader of Offical Opposition.

    My point of view is that the Chinese leaders actually wanted this to happend, they wanted an opposing force in Hong Kong’s government where it would question the judgement of 煲呔.

    This would actually make more sense to why 袋巾 would be allowed to enter the election.

    Maybe 袋巾 should now step up and become the leader of the offical opposition.

    If this fails, it is not as others have said ‘Hong kong people have won it’ it is ‘Hong Kong people have lost! Completely lost for their naive understanding of an election’

  23. In response to”普選 ? Sorry, Poor 選”, Cytodex兄, 瘋人 and 劉慧卿’s assertions:
    .
    Awesome analyses gentlemen (please correct me if I am wrong on my gender specificity) and 卿姐. Allow me to summarize your points here and put Beijing’s tactics in perspective:
    .
    1. Amended the Basic Law to Stagnate Any Possible Movements to Alter the Present Election Model:
    .
    (Sorry, couldn’t open the cited document so can’t comment any further on this)
    .
    2. Confuse is the Best Way to Convince:
    .
    Election debates, bowing to the public, parading on the streets expressing gratitude for the “public’s votes" after the election, etc. were nothing but a charade to create smoke and mirrors so that “Hongkongers” might think that this was a “real” election involving 7 million Hongkongers.
    .
    3. Sustain the Prosperity of Hongkongers’ Livelihood under the Present Political System
    .
    From a historical point of view, sustained poverty invariably sparked revolts from the commoners/grassroots. Take the Qing (Ching) Dynasty as an example. Despite the governance by an ethnic tribe preceded by a massacre in the City of Kar Ding, Chinese were by and large content with the governance in the Qing Dynasty mainly due to the prosperity they were enjoying in the early years of the 268-year period, compared with the corrupt Ming Dynasty in its final years.
    .
    4. Marginalize Pro-Democratic Parties by Using Intangible Means to Lure or Threaten the Existence of Certain Media Organizations

    Pro-democratic movements are suffering from very limited coverage by the media. In contrast, pro-small-circle-election events are enjoying extended and celebrated coverage by more than 90% of the media.
    .
    5. Use Paradoxical “Consensus” to Support the View that Hong Kong is Not Yet Politically Mature Enough to Have a General Election.
    .
    6. An Opposition Leader is Deliberately Set-up to Create an Opposing Force to Sir Donald Tsang
    .
    Pardon me but I am not really sure how I can fit this into my conspiracy theory
    .
    .
    Given Sir Donald Tsang’s background, I personally don’t think he would and could have conjured up such an elaborate scheme to manipulate this kind of propaganda. It comes down to this conclusion: Beijing has been orchestrating the whole show behind the scenes – down to every little detail such as the three 90-degree bows.
    .
    This is more than anyone in his/her right mind can take!!!!! If anyone can come up with some other measures (besides regularly demonstrating on the streets) our pro-democratic heros/heroines can take, please let them or us know.
    .

  24. My brother suggested I might like this blog.
    He was once entirely right. This post actually made my day.

    You cann’t consider just how much time I had spent for this information! Thank you!


發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s

分類

%d 位部落客按了讚: